Skip to content
Copy ID

Previously ATLAS-P-2026-003 · ATLAS-R-006

PreprintPreprintOpen Access

Cognitive Attack Topology (CAT): A Topological Framework for Modeling and Detecting Human-Centric Cyber Attacks

  • Dhadi Sai Praneeth Reddy1
  • M. Jithender Reddy
  • GNR Prasad
  • et al.
  1. 1 Atlas AI Labs

Preprints.org · Mar 2026

01

Brief

Problem
Fraud detection focuses on technical signals, but scams succeed by exploiting psychology: fear, urgency and trust.
Approach
Cognitive Attack Topology introduces data models that mathematically classify the psychological signals used in digital fraud.
Contribution
A structured way to describe and detect the human side of cyber attacks.

02

Status

Preprint
  1. Idea
  2. Experiments
  3. Drafting
  4. Review
  5. Released (current stage)

03

Abstract

The dominant paradigm in cybersecurity continues to privilege infrastructure, protocol integrity, and endpoint resilience, while an increasing fraction of high-impact attacks bypasses these controls by directly manipulating human cognition. This work formalizes such attacks as structured distortions within human digital trust interactions, introducing Cognitive Topological Cybersecurity (CTC) as a rigorous analytical framework. Within this paradigm, interactions are modeled as a high-dimensional manifold whose geometry encodes trust relationships across users, communication channels, and psychological signals. The proposed Cognitive Attack Topology (CAT) framework operationalizes this view through the construction of a Trust Topology Tensor (TTT), enabling the quantification of adversarial influence via Cognitive Distortion Energy (CDE) and its normalized form, the Trust Distortion Index (TDI). A complementary Cognitive Manipulation Score (CMS) captures the composite effect of urgency, fear, authority, and persuasion signals. The framework is instantiated in a multi-layer architecture that integrates transformer-based signal decomposition with dynamic graph modeling and topological anomaly detection. Empirical evaluation is conducted on the GCT-100K dataset, a large-scale benchmark comprising real, public, and synthetically generated cognitive attack interactions. The CAT model achieves a ROC-AUC of 0.9555, exceeding conventional text-based baselines, while maintaining robustness under adversarial cloaking conditions. Notably, performance remains invariant across linguistic boundaries, with a multilingual AUC of 0.984, indicating that topological features of trust manipulation exhibit language-agnostic structure. These results establish that human-targeted cyber-attacks can be detected not as isolated semantic artifacts, but as measurable geometric perturbations in trust space, motivating a shift toward cognition-aware, topology-driven defensive systems.
  • Cognitive security
  • Topological data analysis
  • Social engineering
  • Trust
  • GCT-100K

04

Where to read it

05

Identifiers

06

Write-up

The idea

Most security tooling asks what an attack is. CAT asks how it works on a person, modelling fear and urgency triggers as signals that can be classified.

07

Cite this work

Reddy, D. S. P., Reddy, M. J., & Prasad, G., et al. (2026). Cognitive Attack Topology (CAT): A Topological Framework for Modeling and Detecting Human-Centric Cyber Attacks [Preprint]. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19303021
.bib .ris

Want to discuss or collaborate on this work?

Questions, replications, reviews and collaborations are all welcome.